Lab 7

This first map shows the population breakdown by US county for percent Asian. I used a green-based graduated color system to represent the density of percentage change.  As the map shows, the highest density of asian population percentage are present along the west coast, as well as the Northeast United States.  The more inland off both coasts, the less asians make up a part of the total county population.

This second map shows the population breakdown by US county for percent Black. I used a red-based graduated color system to represent the density of percentage change.  As the map shows, the highest density of black population percentage are present within the Southeast United States.  There also appears to be a slightly higher black population percentages within Southern California. Much of the northern part of the United States is characterized by low densities of black citizens.

The third map shows the population breakdown by US county for percent "Some Other Race". I used a random graduated color system to represent the density of percentage makeup.  As the map shows, the highest density of 'some other race' population percentage are present within the Southwest United States.  The Midwest and Northeast are mainly characterized by counties of low percentages of other races.

I am very impressed with the power and capability of GIS.  My ability to spatially and even temporally manipulate and represent data is extremely important in conveying points in a scholarly manner.  This course has taught me many the basic fundamentals needed to operate the program, yet I still want to learn many more of the advanced functions and processes.   I plan to use GIS in my future work endeavors no matter what field it may be.

Lab #6

The area that I selected is located within the east Bay Area of Northern California.  I found this area particularly interesting because of the fact that it includes deep depressions in elevation from the actual bay, as well as peaks from near hills and mountains. The extent information goes as follows:
N: 38.11969           W: -122.23729
S: 37.50723            E: -121.78501
The coordinate system used for these images is the GCS North American 1983.

Lab 5 part II

Lab 5

Map projections come in a variety of styles and shapes, with each one highlighting different geographical parameters.  The reason for such differences comes from the multitude of ways one can take the three-dimensional surface of the earth and lay them out on a two-dimensional surface.  Depending on which type of distortion has occurred, a specific map projection can show one or more—but never all—of the following: true distances, true directions, true areas, or true shapes.  By understanding the type of distortion that occurs within each projection, one can specifically choose to view a particular projection for the most accurate information on one of these four parameters.  

            Conformal maps are an example of a projection that preserves shapes and angles locally.  This means that on a large-scale, broad shapes and angles will not be accurately represented, thus altering the exact distances between points on the map.  When looking at a 7.5 minute quadrangle map, conformal projections are normally the best option due to the smaller scale.  The common Mercator map is a popular conformal map that is frequently used in today’s society.

            Equal area projections preserve general areas of geographic parameters.  This type of projection helps to fight against maps that contain gargantuan-sized Greenland land-masses, and provides the viewer with a more accurate description of relative area.  Comparison of size between two continents, or even two cities will be much easier and straight-forward.  The drawback to using equal area projections though is the fact that distances are distorted.  If one wants to find a projection that illustrates the clearest distances between objects, an equal area map would not be the best one to choose.

            One final type of map projection is the equidistant model.  These are unique in that distances from the center of the projection to any other place on the map are uniform in all directions.  For someone concerned with exact and precise distance measurements, equidistant projections will provide the most accurate data compared to real-world numbers.  The one draw back though is the fact that area and shape may be distorted in order to account for the equidistance.  

Technical difficulties occurred while re-formatting maps to jpeg form.  I will email the pdf version to Cameran and then try to re-post them as soon as possible on the blog.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Lab 4

           The world of GIS is incredibly vast and expansive, giving its users power over geographical information and its association to any parameter of interest.  In my mind, the single greatest component of GIS is the configuration of layers.  To be able to isolate, order, and compare multiple data sets dealing with different issues, and look at them together is an incredibly useful tool.  The spatial overlay of numerous parameters can be used in any field, and the ability to easily create layers, turn them on or off, alter their properties, and highlight their location makes disseminating information much easier.  

            With this powerful tool comes a bit of a lag time though.  The one frustrating thing about working with ArcMap within GIS is that when you zoom in or out, or even drag your map the smallest amount to a new location, it takes a bit for the program to produce the desired view.  I find myself watching the little globe at the bottom of the screen turning round and round while I wait for the map to update.  It doesn’t seem so bad within this explanation, but when you have to wait for that globe every single time you alter the visual outlay, it does become annoying.  As technology continues to improve with time, I see this problem becoming less and less of a big deal.  ESRI will eventually create a program with minimal to no lag time, with no more waiting for everyone’s favorite globe to stop turning.  

            Another annoying aspect of GIS is the dreaded red exclamation point—indicating a broken file pathway for your data.  It is incredibly disheartening opening up a map expecting to see a certain product, only to have all of the data missing and not showing.  Oftentimes it is very confusing and laborious to go back within the files and select where you got your data from, especially when you are dealing with hundreds of types of data. If I were to make a suggestion it would be for GIS to save the exact pathway within itself, so that if the files are broken, the user can easily see where they must search to acquire the correct data.

            Overall, I see GIS as an incredibly important and useful tool in any field, but more specifically within the environmental science field as well.  I currently work for an environmental consulting firm that deals with litigation against big-time industrial polluters, and the functions that GIS allows us to use to show pollutant migration and residential zones affected is paramount to our success.  We actually have three associates who specialize in GIS and only work on maps and different visual representations of the environmental situations all over the country.  Their ability to isolate facilities and highlight their polygon, shade over areas of contamination, and provide better understanding of the topology are the most simple and powerful pieces of evidence in a court of law.  I definitely see myself working with GIS in the future and am excited to continue to learn about the program and everything that it offers.

Lab #3

Here is the link to my Google Map.  It lists all of the locations of Travel Channel's "Man vs. Food" first 3 seasons, as well as the food eaten, and the result of the "duel".

http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl

Neogeography is an incredibly important field in the individual citizen's right to create spatial and temporal relationships on any aspect they want to explore.  I see it as being similar to Open Office, in that it allows any person to be able to create a spatial outlay of any type of information without having to pay for expensive software like GIS.  Also, it is much easier to share these maps with the entire internet community, leading to a vast network of individual interests becoming interconnected.  From a creative point of view, I think neogeography allows greater communication of geographic knowledge.

One of the pitfalls of this free, open service though is that it can lead to inaccurate or biased information to be distributed all throughout the web.  Say for example a student is studying a certain topic for school, comes upon a map they find on google, and uses its information as being completely trusted and correct.  How can that student guarantee the validity of spatial outlay and data incorporated within the map?  I think the best way that neogeography can be implemented in our society is if we can implement a system of checks, so as to minimize the amount of illegitimate information flowing through the web.

Lab #2

1. Beverly Hills Quadrangle

 2.        A) Canoga Park

B) Van Nuys

C) Burbank

D) Topanga

E) Hollywood

F) Venice

G) Inglewood

3.      3.   1995

4.      4.     North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27)

·         Projection and 1000-meter grid

·         Universal Transverse Mercator, zone 11 10,000 foot ticks

·         CA Coordinate System of 1927 (zone 7)

        North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83)

·         Dashed corner ticks

National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929

5.      5.     1:24,000 scale

6.       6.   At above scale

a.       5 cm on map = 1200 m on ground

b.      5 in on map = 1.89 miles on map

c.       1 mile on ground = 2.64 inches on map

d.      3 km on ground = 12.5 cm on map

7.       7.   Contour Interval = 20 ft

8.       8.   Geographic Coordinates

a.       Public Affairs Building

M/S/D: Longitude:  118®26’30’’   Latitude: 34®4’30’’

Degree Decimal: Longitude: 118.441667   Latitude: 34.075

b.      Tip of Santa Monica Pier

M/S/D: Longitude: 118®30’    Latitude: 34®30’’

Degree Decimal:  Longitude: 118.5    Latitude: 34.008333

c.       Upper Franklin Canyon Reservoir

M/S/D:  Longitude: 118®24’30’’    Latitude: 34®7’

Degree Decimal:  Longitude: 118.408333    Latitude: 34.116667

9.      9.    Approximate Elevation (feet and meters)

a.       Greystone Mansion: 580 ft  =  176.8 m

b.      Woodlawn Cemetery : 140 ft  =  42.7 m

c.       Crestwood Hills Park: 760 ft   =  231.6 m

1110.   UTM Zone of map of Beverly Hills = Zone 11

1111.  UTM Coordinates for bottom left corner = Zone 11, Easting 361500, Northing 3763000

1212.  Amount of square miles of one UTM grid cell = 1 km x 1 km = 1,000,000 square meters

    13. Elevation profile along N3771000

14. Magnetic declination of map = 14 ˚

15. Water flow direction = North to South

      16.